Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Jeonju District Court on December 6, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 12th of the same month. Defendant B was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence of imprisonment for six months at the Jeonju District Court on December 6, 2013 and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month on the 14th of the same month, and Defendant C was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence of imprisonment for six months at the Jeonju District Court on March 31, 2015 for a violation of the Automobile Management Act at the support of the Southern District Court of the Jeonju District Court on March 31, 2015.

4. 8. The judgment became final and conclusive.

[2] Defendant A conspired with Defendant B, a person who operated M real estate with L in Y in Y in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gu, 2012, and was aware of the purchase of a motor vehicle in the name of the victim and to sell it at will. Defendant A conspired with Defendant C, a seller of the motor vehicle, who purchased the motor vehicle in the name of the victim and sold it at will.

1. The Defendant A and the Defendant B’s joint crime committed on or around June 3, 2012 sold the land and buildings owned by the Party to the Party, after selling the land and buildings owned by the Party to the Party, the price would be paid KRW 50 million in the difference of the market price, if the Plaintiff exchanged the land and buildings owned by the Party with the Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun (2,365 square meters), P (129 square meters), Q (129 square meters), R (96 square meters) land in the Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun (134 square meters), and building (2nd multi-household), and the land and buildings owned by the Party to the Party.

Defendant B, on the 7th of the same month, stated that “A person who intends to die the above real estate owned by S, would purchase the above land and buildings owned by S with the victim’s KRW 150 million.”

However, in fact, Defendant B did not pay the selling price to the victim after selling S’s above land and building at the request of Defendant A, but did not have the intention or ability to purchase S’s above land and building.