beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단4162

절도

Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, and the defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

2. Defendant B is the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, on February 12, 2009, was sentenced to three years and six months of the suspension of execution on the grounds of special robbery, etc. in the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch, which was sentenced to three years and six months of the suspension of execution on October 1, 2009, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 11, 2010, and the said suspension of execution was invalidated, and the execution of said sentence was terminated in the Daegu Prison Prison on August 19, 2012.

[2015 Highest 4162]

1. On August 9, 2015, around 19:13, the Defendant: (a) pretended to be a customer in the “F” bank operated by the Victim E in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) concluded that Defendant A had the victim enter the bank, “I wished to purchase the gold stuff with a volume of KRW 2 million;” (c) the victim, who showed the victim’s 190,000 won at the display stand, 190,000 won in the market price at the display stand, 18K’s cirth of 190,000 won in the victim’s hand, and carried the said cherth of cherth from March 17, 2015 to August 29, 2015, he/she stolen the victim’s property equivalent to KRW 1,0720,000 in total (the victim’s G No. 8 per year was corrected by a correction of his/her name) through eight times.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in sales and purchase business of precious metals at the “I” bank located in the Gyeongbuk-si, Gyeongbuk-si.

At around 12:30 on July 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) purchased 1 and 7.1 money from 18 KK male gold bars at the market price equivalent to KRW 2.8,50,000,000, which was owned by the victim J. 5 of the crime list of the above paragraph (1) at the above gold bank; and (b) purchased 1 and 7.1 money from 18 KK male gold bars at the above gold bank, the Defendant confirmed the above A’s identification card; and (c) examined whether the gold dog was in possession, the motive for sale, and the price suitable for the transaction rate, and acquired stolen goods by purchasing 1.78,00,00 won at the price due to negligence, which neglected to make a judgment on the stolen goods.

(b).