When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 14:00 on September 21, 2015, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the case, such as the obstruction of auction at the above court 2014 senior 440, 461 (Joint) B with Dobong-gu Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul), and then, “B reported the processed Lien to recover to the Government of Gyeonggi-do, but it has been attached to the waiver of the reported Lien” with the agreement signed on November 15, 2010 that “B was not the actual owner of the above real estate, but the Defendant used several authorities at the time of the auction of the hotel of this case,” but it was not known that “B was the witness of this case or his defense counsel's testimony against the above questions of whether he is the owner of the hotel,” and “I would like to know that there is a false testimony or testimony against the above law.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol of examination of witness and each protocol of oath;

1. Agreements;

1. A letter of waiver of a lien;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written confirmation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Detention at a workhouse;