2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized all of his own crimes, that some of the crimes is committed, that the Defendant’s health appears to be not good, and that there is no discovery of the records of punishment in excess of the same criminal record or fine, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the method and circumstances of the crime, the crime of this case was committed while under the influence of alcohol by the defendant, and the crime of this case was committed with multiple victims or attempted to sustain, and its nature is considerably poor in light of the method and circumstance of the crime, the agreement with the victims or did not recover from the damage, and all other factors of sentencing indicated in the records of this case, including the defendant's age, environment, sexual conduct, background and motive of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be acknowledged that the sentencing of the court below is unfair due to excessive reason. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.