However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 2, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, around 03:30 on October 2, 2015, the Defendant driven a c-hurb-pured car with a shooting distance of 10 complexes of 10 households of the mountain village in Yongsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, and a double-use apartment site with a alcohol content of 0.170% under the influence of alcohol concentration in blood, and left the left.

At the time, since it is a night and a long distance in which signal lights are installed, a motor vehicle driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, as above, Defendant D (59) who was a victim D (59) who was proceeding to the right-hand edge on the right-hand side of the E-si that was driven by Defendant in accordance with normal new code due to negligence in violation of the alcohol and driving signal as seen above, was placed the front side of the E-si driven by Defendant as the front side of the said E-si.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim D’s injury, such as cage cage cages, etc., which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim F (20 years of age), who is a taxi passenger, to whom the number of days of medical treatment cannot be known, and the victim G (20 years of age) was unable to know the number of days of medical treatment.

2. On the day specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content 0.170% in alcohol while under the influence of alcohol on the part of approximately 1.3km from the 2nd Do of the Sinsan-dong-dong, Seoyang-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu to the shooting distance specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the statutes of the response request for appraisal;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1, and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. A violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;