beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2020.01.09 2019고단1981

특수폭행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:09 on June 17, 2019, the Defendant, as a student of B University C, was required to bear the burden in B University C located in Dong-dong, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, B, and was criticized by the victim G (ma, 23 years of age), H (ma, 24 years of age) who is a member of Dong-ri, Dong-ri, Dong-gu, Dong-ri, Dong-ri, and was criticized by the victim G (ma), who is a member of Dong-ri, Dong-ri, Dong-ri, Dong-dong, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, and Had the victims at the above place, and the victim H considered the victims as “I want to hear the victim’s horse’s left-hand shoulder,” and the victim H’s h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h k, who caused the victim’s h h h h h k.

As a result, the defendant set the 5th left side of the 14-day medical treatment to the victim G, and assaulted the victim H by carrying dangerous objects.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The police statement of H;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act of self-defense or legitimate defense even if the defendant committed a brupt of the victim G, even though he committed a brupt of the victim G, there is no injury by hand, and there is no causation between the price level and the injury level, and even if the defendant spreads the victim G, it constitutes a legitimate act.

According to each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the victim G did not appeal the victim G to the police officer who was dispatched, and even when he was investigated by the police more than 3 hours after the same day, the neck refers to the stroke, and the fact that the police officer did not make a statement about the stroke, but it is recognized that the stroke, but the reason and the fact of the stroke, etc. are different.