사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On July 16, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 24, 2015.
[Public invitation and role of the Defendant] Defendant A is a person who operates the “E” in the Si of Jung-Eup, and Defendant B is a manufacturer of the “F” game machine established in the above “E” and a person who actually operates the “H” in G in the same City.
The Defendants: (a) exchanged the scores obtained by customers with “F” game “E” free of charge or frequency collection vouchers; and (b) offered customers a free experience ticket in “E” so that they can reuse the game machine; and (c) offered a frequency voucher in “H” to exchange them in cash or offer a price-oriented conference corresponding thereto.
【Criminal Facts】
Defendant
A according to the above public offering, from May 28, 2014, the same year.
7. Until April 7, 200, in operating the “E”, 40 game machine of “F”, which is a speculative electronic machine, provided it to many and unspecified customers for them to play games for 20 minutes per 10,000 won, and provided them with 20 minutes per 10,000 won to customers, and then automatically obtain points if the score is distributed on the game screen, and provide them with 10,000 won free of charge or 10,00 won per 10,000 won per 10,000 won, and after deducting 10% from the fee, they provided them to customers to play games or exchange them at “H”.
Defendant
B The same year from May 28, 2014 according to the above public offering.
6. By the end of 29.2, when operating “H” and providing customers with a right to collect frequency, customers were given a right to exchange money in cash after deducting 10% of the fee or a right to live together with a price corresponding thereto.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit gambling and other gambling by using game products, and at the same time commit speculative electronic forms.