2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff was a school juristic person established and operated on September 19, 1988, and was established and operated by B, etc.

From November 3, 2009 to December 5, 2009, the Defendant investigated the civil petition case concerning the unfair operation of the music department curriculum in B High School B from the date of the same year, and revealed the fact that the Plaintiff suffered a loss in the class of the subject of the major class by conducting part of the class out of the music department’s class class, and calculated the actual completion time for one year of the subject of the major class as shown in the attached Table (1) by deducting the time recognized to compensate for the loss in the business of the major class, such as the evaluation time, from the time of the above class loss.

B. On December 21, 2009, the Defendant rendered the following dispositions (hereinafter “instant case investigation results disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the basis of the aforementioned case investigation results.

1. There is a fact that the class of the major skill for each school year has been deficit, such as in the attached Table (1) of the content of the class hours calculation sheet.

2. 【Administrative Disposition”: The main time shall be determined and implemented by establishing and implementing a special reinforcement plan for the completion of classes by grade caused by the specialized courses of correction and the individual Lesson (1:1 class) and submitting a copy of the plan, accompanied by the result.

【Disposition on Status: A disciplinary action shall be taken against a person involved in improper operation and management of the music department class class, as follows, so that it is not possible to do so in the future.

The principal C, assistant principal D, teachers E [based on recognition] of a person related to minor disciplinary action, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the investigation results and dispositions of this case are legitimate

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff did not conduct the class attendance of the Plaintiff as much as the required class time of the said class attendance calculation table. However, in addition to the supplement time of the class attendance approved by the Defendant, the following hours of the class room also supplement the class attendance.