2. The facts that the defendant led to the crime of this case, the degree of damage to the damage of this case and the crime of the damage of this case is relatively significant. However, even though the defendant had been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, the defendant committed the crime of this case repeatedly at the same time, the crime of this case is extremely poor, such as threatening the victim more old and difficult than the defendant, threatening the victim, and threatening him, and thus, it does not seem that the defendant's wrong act is unfolded by the investigation process, such as speaking to the effect that he would be retaliation against the victim, threatening the police officer in charge of the investigation, etc., and it does not seem that there is no circumstance that the defendant tried to use the letter to the victim or endeavor to recover the damage until the trial. In full view of the defendant's age, sexual behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means, method and consequence of the crime, the situation before and after the crime, and the relation of criminal records, etc., the defendant and the defendant's assertion of the punishment of this case are not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.