A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00, and Defendant D and E shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The defendants are the defendants.

Defendants are members of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee of G in Do-si, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, and the victim H is the director of the management office of the above apartment management office. Defendants demanded the victim to leave from around April 2015 on the ground that the fixed-term contract period of the company I with limited liability to which the victimized person belongs has expired as of December 27, 2013, and the victim was selected as an apartment controlled entity through lawful procedures, and the victim left the office after leaving the office of management.

The position was different.

1. The Defendants’ joint crimes committed by the Defendants were committed on August 2, 2016, with the mind that they forced the management office to leave the said apartment management office because they did not leave the said apartment management office, and that they forced to remove the door by replacing the key of the entrance, and then bring up the door to the entrance of the office, and sit up on the door thereafter, from that point of time.

4. By up to 11:00, a limited company including victims was unable to enter the office of its employees to prevent them from entering the office.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's apartment management work by force.

2. On August 1, 2016, Defendants A, B, and C jointly committed the crime: (a) decided that the said Defendants forced the said office to move out of the management office; and (b) decided that the said office should be forced to move out; and (c) the key repair contractor forced the Defendant to remove the entrance door corresponding to KRW 50,000 at the market price used by the Defendant I employees of the limited company, including the victim, by force.

Accordingly, the above defendants jointly damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and J;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to H and J;

1. An investigation report (a photograph of the damaged key, a quotation, and a copy of the judgment) - a photograph of destruction, a quotation, an investigation report (a copy of the decision attached) - a written decision.