The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Comprehensively taking into account the evidence adopted in its judgment, the court below rejected the Plaintiff’s agreement that the Plaintiff purchased KRW 762,00 from F around the beginning of August 201 at KRW 25,00,00 (per unit of KRW 330,00) and the Defendant sold it to the Plaintiff and agreed that the Defendant would have to sell more than KRW 420,00 as to the sales volume, and that the Defendant would have to sell profits at least KRW 420,00 (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The Defendant sold approximately 147,968, out of the two terms of this case at KRW 50,00 and deducted the expenses calculated at KRW 420,00,00,000 for the remainder of the contract at KRW 46,281,560,00,00,000 for the remainder of the contract at KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000,000).

In light of the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and the judgment of the court below which recognized the fact that the plaintiff claimed for the payment of the contract under the premise that the contract of this case was a contract for consignment sales, and that F illegally shipped out part of the end of this case and sold salt at salt, was entrusted to F with the sale of the end of this case.