When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant and C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, from January 13, 2013 to January 14, 2013, divided into five: (a) n,O, etc. on a sexually influor L L in Ulsan-gu L to January 14, 2013; and (b) up to five (5) n, etc. on five (4) boxes using Chapter 20; and (c) up to three (10) or 20 (10) the remaining n, after adding up the number of heads of two (2) the sum of the remaining n, the sum of the sum of the sum of money remaining after having 10 or 20 (3) the sum of two (2) the sum of the sum of money remaining after having 10 or 20 (10) the sum of money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the witness P;

1. Protocols of examination of witnesses concerning the witnessF;

1. Application of each police’s statement protocol to Q Q

1. Relevant Article 246 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty, and selection of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. Defendant A and C, D, E, F, G, H, H, I, J, and K: (a) from January 12, 2013 to January 13, 2013, from January 13, 2013 to January 03:00, Defendant A and C, D, E, F, H, I, J, and K were divided from the first floor personal office located in Ulsan-si L to April 13, 2013 into a sex n,O, etc.; (b) from the first floor personal office located in Ulsan-si L to April 13, 2013, the Defendant divided the Defendant into five parts via Chapter 20; and (c) the remaining three nives other than the nives by adding up the number of heading three to the lives of heading 10 or 20; and (d) the remaining nives refer to a “pre-passing one by a person with a high number of money in a way that sells.

2. The evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant had stuffed at the time and place specified in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to prove it otherwise.

Therefore, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the above defendant is acquitted by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.