D. The instant text is written to the effect that if the Defendant knew of the certification, he was written to the effect that he was the year of N.L., as the end of N. H., and that he was insulting and defamationed several times before the victim, the Defendant prepared the instant text requiring the victim to provide the above certification on one occasion. As such, in light of the developments leading up to the formation of the instant text, the entire content, purport, and the context before and after the victim, the Defendant did not have any awareness or intent to insult the victim, which constitutes a justifiable act, and thus, the illegality is dismissed.

2. Determination:

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the same facts as D are recognized.

1) The Defendant, on September 6, 2016, posted a letter to the effect that “O” under the title “O” on the E Caf page of the Nonet Port D website, is illegal for reporters, such as S or T, who operate a national tax or receive support therefor, to receive a taxi fee, or to receive and report money from the accident scene. However, since the reporters of Internet newspapers do not receive monetary support from the State, the reporters of Internet newspapers may receive money from the State, write down articles and receive a taxi fee, and receive a taxi fee,” and criticizes them at the end, who criticizes them.

Han-so-called “sik ?”, and in writing written comments written on September 8, 2016 01:04 above, “Sanon-sibol” is complete.

“.....”

2) On September 8, 2016, the victim written comments on September 8, 2016 by the Defendant’s above-mentioned writing.