However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 30, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court, and a fine of one million won as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on August 27, 2012.

On December 4, 2013, at around 00:02, the Defendant, without a car driver’s license, driven C vehicles with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.073% at a distance of about 500 meters from the street in front of the Seo-gu Pyeongdong Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul to the front day of the same scopium.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records: The application of criminal records, inquiry and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considering the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The judgment of probation is to be rendered under the condition of the order to attend a lecture only once considering the following: (a) the defendant, with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, has been twice the criminal records of the same drinking driving; (b) in addition, there is a need for strict punishment in that the defendant would not repeat the crime of this case; (c) the defendant would not repeat the crime of this case against his mistake; and (d) the above same criminal records were both fines; and (e) the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, etc., when determining the specific punishment, are