However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, in collusion with D and E, accessed casino customers at the entrance of the G G G casino located in Gangwon-gun F, caused the casino customers to spawn the drug ingredients of the Rash, which is a local mental medicine, to spawn and spawn the drug, and had the mind mixed with each other by using the gap with the mental disorder due to the influence of the above ingredients.

Accordingly, around 06:00 on October 22, 2010, the Defendant and D enticed the victim I to a K restaurant located in the J of H Park in the vicinity of G casino Y Park, and E naturally and naturally joined the above restaurant as if D et al. were to have the same from the above restaurant, and D allowed the victim to drinks containing the soft ingredients.

Since then, according to D and E’s plan, the Defendant d and e gambly called “3 development card” as agreed in advance by using the gap in mind, and the Defendant d and e gambling in a way that the Defendant 52 card with a display of order (one name card) so that she can return to the winning as desired.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with D and E on the same day from around 08:00 to 09:00 of the same day, obtained 5.6 million won from the injured party by using a op-E card gambling at several times, and obtained 5.6 million won from the injured party. Despite the fact that the drug handler is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant used a drug of Rabling ingredients, which is a local mental medicine, by making the victim drink it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of D by the prosecution (No. 5th page 794 of the investigation records);

1. Each police statement with regard to I or L;

1. Transmission of the results of each request for appraisal, diagnosis and treatment set, and mobile phone evidence analysis;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 347 of the choice of punishment.