1. The Defendant had no intent to pay the cost, even if he/she uses a taxi.

Nevertheless, as if the taxi fee is paid, the complainant is belonging to the defendant, and around 04:20 on August 20, 2012, the victim was taken aboard the D taxi operated by the victim C from the Jindong-dong, Busan, to the Gindong-dong, Busan, and he did not pay 15,900 won for the taxi and acquired the same amount by means of escape.

2. 모욕의 점 피고인은 전항과 같은날 05:00경 부산 동래구 안락동 노상에서 피고인이 택시비를 지불하지 않고 도망을 가다가 피해자에게 붙잡힌 후, 피고인의 엄마, E지구대 경사 F, G, H이 있는 앞에서 피해자가 피고인의 엄마에게 “아줌마”라고 말하는 것에 화가나서 피고인은 “좃같다, 좃같이 말한다”라고 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. C Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing filing of complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse (50,000 won per day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do111, Jan. 1, 2011>