공사대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant, the owner of the building, completed the Changho Construction Work among the 2 and 3th extension works in Jeju-si Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction work”). The Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for payment of KRW 29.1 million for the cost of Changho Construction and the damages for delay.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number), the Defendant: (a) contracted all of the instant construction works to D on September 2, 2013; (b) changed the contractor on November 10, 2013; and (c) subcontracted the instant construction works to the Plaintiff during the instant construction works; (c) the Plaintiff prepared and submitted a estimate for the creative construction works on February 11, 2014; and (d) the Plaintiff directly received KRW 15 million from the Defendant, the owner of the building on April 11, 2014, who was the completion of the construction works, who was the owner of the building on April 11, 2014, and received the subcontract from the Defendant, but the Defendant received KRW 15 million out of the construction costs directly from the Defendant; and (c) the Plaintiff can only be recognized as having received a receipt from the Defendant, barring any special circumstances.
The Plaintiff entered into a contract directly with the Defendant for the Chang Ho Construction Work.
Although the defendant alleged that he/she made a verbal agreement to pay the price for the creative construction work directly to the plaintiff, it is difficult to believe that the statement on the evidence No. 4 and the statement on the remaining evidence No. 2 submitted by the plaintiff is sufficient to conclude that the defendant agreed to pay the price for the creative construction work directly to the plaintiff exceeding the above 15 million won, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion otherwise.
3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.