변호사법위반
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
The lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged.
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of Article 111(1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “solicitation or mediation concerning cases or affairs handled by public officials”, by specifying facts charged, by misapprehending
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.