beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.01.21 2015나28323

위자료

Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2...

Reasons

The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be judged together.

1. On August 4, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant asserted that: (a) the Plaintiff had a hearing of the Defendant’s horse from the Plaintiff, and that “D” was placed on the free bulletin board of the Internet portal site (hereinafter “instant Internet camera”); (b) “D”; (c) the Plaintiff participated in the trial monitoring; (d) forced female members to comply with alcohol; (d) female members’ compliance was exposed; (e) the prevention program was accompanied; and (e) the Plaintiff sent letters to the Plaintiff that would encourage female members to visit the house of its members. The Plaintiff was subject to a complaint from the Plaintiff, “E (M)” that constitutes the crime of death with a thickness of female members; and (e) the time when she voluntarily withdraws from the Internet portal site was removed; and (e) the Defendant did not have any fact that the Plaintiff made such remarks in the investigation; and (e) the Defendant did not have any responsibility to make a false statement on the Plaintiff’s reputation, stating that it was “D,” the Defendant made a false statement on the Plaintiff’s Internet bulletin board No. 5.

In this regard, the defendant is the cause of counterclaim, and the plaintiff received 'B' from G not more than 9 million won on the Internet camera bulletin board of this case, and was a litigation, and the argument was closed.

In addition, this paper will refer to the application for resumption of oral argument, application for tiny, and summary preparation on August 2014 and send it to the mail.

In addition, B sent the money to the community credit cooperative during the litigation period, around August 2014, after considering the fact that the community credit cooperative became aware of the money, B sent the money to the community credit cooperative as a summary of the application for change of title, request for the extension of the date, the appointment of the party, the addition of essential co-litigants, and the evidence description.

However, regarding B in this case.