"2016 Highest 11"

1. On October 201, 201, the criminal defendant against the victim B is required to pay money to the victim B from the mutual infinites located in the children of the Donjin-gu, Soon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

When lending money to the owner of a highway, he said that he would remove the panel (the called "market") at the expressway site and sell the panel to repay the money borrowed from the panel.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have secured the right to remove the Highway Panel at the time and did not have any special revenue, so even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

On October 22, 201, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the damaged party to the post office account under the name of the Defendant, KRW 1 million from November 19, 201 to the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant, KRW 1 million from November 24, 201, KRW 300,000,000 from the agricultural bank account under the name of D, KRW 3 million from December 17, 201, and KRW 3 million from the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant on December 17, 201, respectively, and received KRW 7,60,000,000 from the Defendant to the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant on December 17, 2011.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant against the victim E refers to, around November 15, 201, at the G office operated by the victim E in the former North Korea, the victim E, “it is entitled to remove at the latest, 25 million won as the victim would have the right to remove the building from the G office operated by the victim E, who had the right to remove the building by December 20, 201.” On November 20, 201, the victim was entitled to remove at the latest 25 million won as the victim would have the right to remove the building. The right to remove the building from the victim on November 20, 201.

On the face of KRW 39 million, it will also exceed the right to remove the building.

“.....”

However, at the time of fact, the above J building was uncertain, so the defendant did not have the right to remove the building, and there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to construct the building.

The defendant belongs to this.