When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around May 30, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C by phoneing the victim C to the end of the Si of Young-gun, Young-gun, Seoul, and that “If money is short of KRW 5 million in the mass wave operations, the Defendant would make payment with KRW 500,000,000,000,000 after one month thereafter.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to borrow money from the injured party to repay the existing debt, and there was no regular income, and there was no financial institution's debt amounting to about 49 million won, and thus there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if it was borrowed from the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is against the victim as such;

5. Around 31.31. Around the same day, the Nonghyup Bank received money of KRW 5 million from the Defendant’s name account (D).

2. No person who violates the Civil Execution Act shall submit any false list of property to a court;

Nevertheless, the Defendant appears on the date for specification of property relations in accordance with the written decision on the application for specification of property relation filed by the final and conclusive judgment of the loan claim lawsuit filed by the creditor C against the Defendant, at the 101 court of Gwangju District Court Decision No. 15:30 on January 26, 2016, the Defendant would be punished if he/she conceals or prepares any false statement.

Although having taken an oath to the effect that it was “,” the Defendant submitted a false list of assets omitted in the name of the Defendant, which was the sum of KRW 1,693,523, the sum of the deposits of No.C., No. 1,693,523, the Defendant’s name in the name of the former Yong-gun F, and the Defendant’s name, even though he/she had the property of G graphic vehicle,

The facts charged in this part state that “the Defendant omitted the Defendant’s name H 4-wheeled vehicle and the Defendant’s name I Costa vehicle.” However, the said vehicles are Defendant on May 30, 2016 and June 8, 2016, each of which was after the date specified for the property of this case.