마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
Nos. 1 through 4 of seized evidence.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The crime of narcotics, such as the instant crime, requires severe harm to the society as well as the parties due to their toxicity, and thus, requires severe punishment. The Defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime.
However, the defendant's mistake is deeply divided and reflected in depth, and the defendant's behavior is repeated as a sound member of society through active treatment in the future, and the defendant's behavior does not commit a second offense.
The crime of this case under the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court Decision 201Hun-Ba14448 delivered on April 1, 201, which is set forth in the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court Decision 201Hun-Ga48 delivered on April 1, 2012, including drug crime group, penphone trading and mediation, special sentencing factors (such as major investigation cooperation / previous convictions), decision-making on the area of recommendation (one year to two years), and the scope of sentence (one year to one year): Three types (one year), including drug crime group, pen-phone medication and simple possession, special sentencing factors (such as important investigation cooperation / identical criminal areas), three years, the area of recommendation (basic area), the scope of punishment (one year to six years), the specific sentencing factors (one year to one year), the specific sentencing factors (the basic area), the specific sentencing range (the specific sentencing range), the specific sentencing range (the specific sentencing range), the specific sentencing range (the specific sentencing range) and the specific sentencing range (the specific sentencing range).
3. Conclusion, Defendant’s appeal is an appeal.