beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.08.13 2014고단2370

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 27, 2003, when an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged committed a violation of vehicle operation restriction around 18:02, which was applied to the summary order subject to review on March 27, 2003, has lost its retroactive effect in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s unconstitutionality decision, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 3