However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven Cran-do on duty with a two-lane road in front of the CU convenience point in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, and continued two-lanes to the CU convenience point in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun; (b) while driving a motor vehicle into the opposite line, the motor vehicle driver was installed at the center; (c) the motor vehicle driver neglected to perform the duty of care to make an internship at the U.S. permissible point in the U.S.; (d) the driver of the motor vehicle, despite the fact that there was a duty of care to do so at the U.S., and caused the injured party D(W), who was following the two-lanes of the above road at the same direction as the Defendant, had the victim D(S) drive the motor vehicle at the same time; and (d) the driver of the motor vehicle 2nd part of the E-learning car at the same time, who was in need of rescue and injury to the victim 4.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual condition survey report, each photograph, each diagnosis document, and written estimate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant is driving a motor vehicle while drinking alcohol again, even though he/she had a record of being sentenced to a fine due to drinking alcohol, for the reason of sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.

The fact that an accident has escaped is against the agreement with the victim and the mistake is against the victim's circumstances.