However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On March 28, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon, and on June 30, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime in the same court. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 6 million for the same crime in the same court.

[2] On November 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a Bran vehicle while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.068% from the 3km section of LG located in Gumipo-si, Gumipo-si, Gumipo-si, around 12:0 on November 3, 2017 to the 3km of Gumipo-si factory, thereby under the influence of alcohol leveling to 0.068%.

Accordingly, although the defendant had been punished more than twice as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, he once again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving at home, report on the circumstances of the driver at home, and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Previous conviction: Application of a written inquiry and a written summary order, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate amount of punishment (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 20

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (restatement of the aforementioned circumstances);

1. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;