beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2019.02.13 2016가단53295

임금

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 47,321,803 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from November 28, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 23, 2013, the Plaintiff entered a limited liability company D (hereinafter “D”) and worked in the material storage department of the purchase team in the materials and storage department of the Defendant’s three-scale factory logistics distribution team as an employee engaged in the loading, bringing in, transfer, and supply of raw materials at the materials and storage department of the purchase team, and retired on February 14, 2016. On February 15, 2016, the Plaintiff joined the E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) that is the Defendant’s subsidiary company, and retired from office on May 16, 2016.

B. The defendant is a corporation established on June 15, 1957 and engaged in cement manufacturing business, etc. using approximately 1,200 full-time workers, who are engaged in cement manufacturing business, etc.; a business of crushing tin and old soil mined from the F, G, and H mining areas from I mining areas; and then selling them after manufacturing cement at the defendant Cement plant.

D has been awarded a contract with the Defendant for the inspection, cleaning, cement shipping, etc. of the machinery of the Defendant Crown Factory.

C. Meanwhile, on October 17, 2013, the defendant decided to commence rehabilitation procedures from the Seoul Central District Court; decided to obtain the rehabilitation plan on March 18, 2014; the defendant's administrator did not enter the plaintiff in the list of creditors; and the plaintiff did not report the rehabilitation claim in the above rehabilitation procedure of the defendant.

On March 6, 2015, the Defendant had completed the rehabilitation procedure.

The Defendant and D et al. were sentenced to a fine for a crime of being provided with temporary agency services from those who engage in temporary agency services without the permission of the Minister of Employment and Labor without the permission of the Minister of Employment and Labor, by being dispatched 134 employees, such as D's L, etc. from the representative K of in-house subcontractor D, including the Plaintiff, to be engaged in the inspection, cleaning, cement shipping, transportation, etc. of the above three-party factories without the permission of the Minister of Employment and Labor, and the above punishment was finalized.

(2017 Height 1, and the defendant was led to confession in the above criminal case). [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, and this court shall do so.