1. Defendant A is a person who actually operates a G in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government EB and in Pakistan.

From August 15, 2013 to March 28, 2014, the Defendant infringed on the trademark rights of the victim by advertising and business activities, etc. as if the “G” was a subsidiary of the State B, under the trade name of the “G”, which is similar to the trademark registration of the Korea Intellectual Property Office, using the freight forwarding service as the designated service business, etc. as the freight forwarding service.

2. Defendant B, the Defendant, from August 15, 2013 to March 28, 2014, infringed the trademark right of the victim in the same manner as that of the Defendant’s employee, in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 93 (Selection of Fine) of the Trademark Act: Article 97 subparagraph 1 of the Trademark Act and Article 93 (Selection of Fine): Defendant A

1. Penalty of each fine to be suspended, 2,000,000 won;

1. Defendant A in the custody of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in the case of KRW 100,000 per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (A) provides that the victim (state) call, who filed a complaint with the Defendant, wants the Defendants to agree with the Defendant, and there is no criminal power against the Defendant A, and there are extenuating circumstances as to the circumstances leading to the instant crime)