However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM7 car.

1. On January 24, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 06:57% by blood alcohol leveling to 0.131%, and the Defendant driven the said SM7 car at the section of approximately 2.5 km from the Do near the 55-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, to the road located in the 277-ro, the flow route of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

2. On January 24, 2020, the Defendant driving the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 06:57% on blood alcohol level of 0.131% on January 24, 202, and driving the road located in 277 as the oil route in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the flow of the road along the flow route of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, with the flow of the two-lane distance from the flow distance of the two-lane.

In such a case, a driver of a vehicle has a duty of care to maintain a safety distance and to safely drive the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, and to properly operate the steering direction and the system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence while neglecting the above duty of care, was driven by the victim C (hereinafter, 47 years old), who was in the atmosphere of the signal signals held by the Defendant, was driven by the Defendant, to the front part of the said SM7 car driven by the Defendant, and due to the corresponding shock, had the said rocketing car, which was pushed forward in the future, receive the rear part of the FM7 car driven by the victim E (hereinafter, 42 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the above signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, the victim G (the 47 years old), and H (the 7 years old), the passenger of the said SM7 car, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc., and the victim I (the 7 years old), who is the passenger of the said SM7 car, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E.