When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[M] On March 18, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million with a fine of KRW 1,500,000 at the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court on March 13, 2015, on the ground of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) by the Defendant on March 18, 2013, on March 13, 2015, at the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court on the ground of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On March 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 at the Seocheon Branch Branch of the Daejeon District Court on March 16, 201.

[Criminal facts] On February 7, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle B QM3 vehicle with approximately 6km section B at the front of the branch office in the Maart-ro, 187, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu without a driver’s license, with alcohol level of 0.069% in alcohol level among blood transfusion around 02:35, and without a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

[Criminal facts]

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect;

1. Report on the detection of drinking drivers, report on the circumstances of drinking drivers, and report on the results of regulating drinking;

1. Sovereign photographs;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses of motor vehicles (electric power violating Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice);

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, reporting on undispositioned previous convictions, results of confirmation, and application of summary written indictments in the Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 152 (1) and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the reason why the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is imposed and the circumstances leading up to the driving, the Defendant’s enforcement process, the Defendant’s previous convictions three times, and the Defendant’s driving under the influence of alcohol.