[criminal power] On June 12, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the crime of interference with business and damage to property on June 12, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the net prison on October 22, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 21:00 on February 17, 2014, the Defendant, at the D main shop operated by the victim C in Goungung-gun, Goung-gun, Goung-gun, Madju, 3 diseaseed the beer, kid the beer bed on the main floor of the victim’s bath without any particular reason, and kidd the bed and kidsing the bed and kids of the customer E-bating himself.

As a result, it interfered with the victim's work by force for about 1 hour and 35 minutes, such as making 2 male customers who drink alcoholic beverages and have found 4 male customers who drink in this place.

2. The property damage was destroyed by four 160,000,000 won at the market price owned by the victim without any particular reason at the same time and place as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A E-document;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiry reports, such as criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to copies of judgments on criminal records of the same kind of suspect), and Acts and subordinate statutes concerning personal identification and confinement status;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent offenders, the Defendant’s reasons for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act reflects the instant crime.

However, the defendant has committed the same type of crime and has already been sentenced several times of punishment, and committed the crime again with similar contents only for several months and whether the defendant was released from prison.

Considering this point, the sentence of the defendant is deemed inevitable, so it is decided as per Disposition.