마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
4.6 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
[2017 Highest 7594] The Defendant sent to B, upon receipt of a request from B to request the philopon, a nameless person C to send a Melopon (one philopon; hereinafter referred to as “philopon”).
In addition, on February 2, 2017, from Daegu to Seoul, shopping bags containing 20 ghon-phones were sent to high-speed buses.
The Defendant received the shopping bags containing 20g of philophones in Seocho-gu, Seoul, from B to B, “C with philophones,” and B received the shopping bags containing 20g of philophones in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the same day.
After February 3, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 4.6 million from B, in the French area of Songpa-gu Seoul around February 3, 2017.
Accordingly, the defendant sold philophones.
around 20:30 on September 4, 2017, the Defendant visited “Esing” on the first floor of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D, and caused the victim F (46 years) who is the customer at the place where the Defendant expressed his desire to do so. On the ground that the victim F (46 years of age) was able to take a part in front of the sing door door, the victim’s face was 4 to 5 times by hand, and the victim’s body was able to walk up 4 to 5 times, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as a string wall, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
"2017 Highest 7594"
1. Each legal statement of witness B and G;
1. Part B of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant in the prosecution
1. Copy of the statement made by the prosecution concerning G;
1. Investigation report (Attachment of B or A telephone details);
1. A mobile phone H call details;
1. One copy of the call details of the mobile phone B;
1. Investigation report (Analysis of monetary details);
1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the investigation report (the calculation of a surcharge) [the Defendant’s defense counsel asserts that the Defendant was frequently contacted and only met as a matter of the JJ under B and the detention, and that the Defendant’s written opinion on March 29, 2018 is entirely met at the 2-3 degree coffee shop.
However, the mobile phone call content.