On October 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on 03:30 on Chuncheon-si Mancheon-si, the fact is that the Defendant did not have any means to pay the long-distance taxi fare up to the southyang-si, and did not allow any other person to pay the taxi fare; (b) and thus, (c) did not have any intent or ability to pay the taxi fare, and (d) did so as to pay the taxi fare, and (d) did so to the YY-si in Nam-si, Namyang-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul; (b) on 00:30 on the following day after boarding a Do taxi operated by the victim C, the Defendant did not pay KRW 96,360 on the road in front of the YY-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and did not pay KRW 96,3

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the receipt of taxi charges;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The reasons for imposing selective fine for a punishment include multiple juvenile protective disposition, among which the defendant received multiple juvenile protective disposition, but does not seem to have any means similar to this case, the defendant's age is green, the amount of fraud of this case is very low, and the defendant has committed a prison life for a considerable period of time, as set forth in the order.