2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had the history of criminal punishment for multiple violent crimes; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four months for interference with business affairs in 2013; and (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime on January 20, 2015; (b) the elements of unfavorable sentencing, such as the Defendant’s committing the instant crime even after the execution of the sentence was completed on January 20, 2015; (c) the Defendant has agreed with the victim; (d) the wife and two children; (e) favorable sentencing factors, such as the Defendant’s environment, means and consequence; and (e) the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime; and (e) other factors that form the conditions of sentencing specified in the record and the theory of changes, such as the Defendant’s environment, means and consequence; and (e)

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.