except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the owner of a private-use truck in salary C.

The owner or user of a private-use truck shall not provide or lease his private-use truck with or without compensation.

Nevertheless, between March 20, 2015 and 12:30 on March 20, 2015, the Defendant, using the foregoing vehicle, transported F’s moving-out from Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D to the front day of Gyeyang-gu E-gu, Gyeyang-gu, and received KRW 800,000,000 as the fare, and provided a private-use truck for transportation of cargo at a cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Photographs of each violated vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to directors' franchise agreement, freight trucking services license, and automobile registration certificates;

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting an offense, and subparagraph 7 of Article 67 and Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act that choose a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;