A and B Imprisonment for two years, each of them shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

except that this judgment.

No one shall deliver, sell, forge, imitate, or possess a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using or making another person use such trademark on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

Defendant

A is a person who operates the F Co., Ltd., a distribution business, such as smartphone parts and music cards, and Defendant C is a person who operates G Co., Ltd, a corporation that manufactures and sells semiconductor parts, and H H died on July 3, 2018.

I would be the head of the J branch office of the company that exports I smartphone parts to the United States, and Defendant B would be a person who carries on the distribution business of electronic parts, such as smartphones, in the Red bean, Defendant D is a person who operates K that produces smartphones panel, and Defendant E is the head of K's business.

On February 2015, Defendants and H have produced and distributed a tamper panel similar to Lphones of I Co., Ltd. in order to export to the United States, and Defendant B has been in charge of securing companies to export and distribute L Smartphones similar to L, Defendant A and C are in charge of producing and supplying L Smartphones similar tamper panel parts, Defendant D and E are in charge of producing and delivering L Smartphones similar tamper panel from Defendant C, and H is in charge of exporting L smartphones similar tamper parts overseas.

Defendant

B On February 2015, 2015, police officers in China, sent L smartphone similar ITO (e-mail oxides, transparent e-mail with electricity), which was obtained from a person who was not killed in the name (M), to Defendant A by e-mail. Defendant A re-transmission the above drawings at the F office of the said F office to Defendant C’s N-mail. Defendant C sent the above drawings to Defendant E by e-mail at the above G office of the said corporation, and Defendant C sought a reinforcement of the trademark.