When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant and name broker submitted false documents and applied for the loan, and the Defendant expressed false statements about workplace information, etc. from the lending company at the time of the telephone from the lending company to the lender by deceiving the lending company to take charge of the role of deceiving the lending company and receiving the loan.

The Defendant and the above loan broman conspired as above, and as such, they were in office in the workplace of not being actually in office in the Incheon Yandong around February 9, 2010, they belong to the person in charge of loans from the victim corporation, Busan and money, and they were transferred KRW 3 million to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the release of deposits;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;