토지인도
1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the building stated in attached Table 2 List 2.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims.
1. The description of the grounds for the claim is as shown in attached Form 1;
(2) Articles 208(3)1 and 257(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the provisions of Article 208(3)1 and Article 257(1)(a)
3. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the defendant's possession of the building listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter "the building of this case"), which is the plaintiff's ownership, is recognized, but it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant possesses the land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter "the land of this case"), which is the plaintiff's ownership, only the above facts of recognition and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
(E) In light of the above evidence, the plaintiff owned the building of this case, and it is judged that the plaintiff occupied the land of this case through the building of this case). Therefore, the part of the claim for delivery of the land of this case premised on the defendant's possession of the land of this case is rejected.