The defendant, around January 20, 201, operated the victim G in the fourth floor of the building in the Guri-ri F Building on the fourth floor of the building in Southyang-ju, the fact was that the defendant promoted the reconstruction project with the representative of the regional housing association from around 2006 in relation to the reconstruction of the housing in South-ju, and the agency contract with the above JJ was terminated. At the time, the consent letter received from the residents of the above IG was related to the reconstruction project through the establishment of the regional housing association, and the above consent letter was no longer meaningful because all of the above projects were omitted, and even if the defendant was to promote the private apartment project in the above area, the defendant was not a registered business operator who can promote it, and the defendant was not a registered business operator who is not a representative of the agent company in the future, and was not capable of concluding the above IG apartment project under the authority to conclude the above IG apartment project, and the defendant has already obtained the consent of the residents of the above IG apartment zone up to 85% of the expenses related to the above 1000 billion won.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received property equivalent to KRW 70 million in total from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, K, L, M and N;

1. Part of the prosecutor's protocol of examination of the defendant

1.O future project implementation schedule, implementation note, letter of contract for removal of designated objects, certificate of registered matters, etc., and conditions for the O apartment project plan, feasibility review, etc. in Namyang-si;