beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.12.27 2012고단2419

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 15, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the appellate court of the Seoul Northern District Court, and the appeal is pending in the Supreme Court.

"2012 Highest 2419"

1. On October 25, 2010, the Defendant forged a private document in the “E” office operated by D in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant, even though having not been delegated by F with the purchase of mobile phones and the opening of the mobile phone, did so as to have been delegated by F with the purchase and opening of the mobile phone from F, and without authorization, stated “F, G, Gu, Si, Si, H” in the customer information column of the service contract kept at the same place using a certified studio without authorization for the purpose of exercising the right. After entering “F” in the name column of the end of each document, the Defendant forged two new service contracts in the above F, a private document related to rights and obligations by signing “F”.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, displayed a forged private document by delivering two copies of the service contract forged as if it were actually prepared to the said D, who was unaware of the circumstances.

3. In collusion with the Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, and in fact, the Defendant did not have been delegated by the F to purchase or open a mobile phone, and did not have intent or ability to pay the purchase or opening of the mobile phone. In addition, the Defendant: (a) had been delegated by F; (b) had the victim D who was an employee of F; and (c) had the victim D by deceiving him/her, who was an employee; and (d) had the victim; (b) had the two cell phone units owned by D from the victim; and (c) had the victim by deceiving him/her to use it from that time until August 201; and (d) had the victim paid the total amount of KRW 4.3 million of the mobile phone price and the user fee

The defendant of "2012 Highest 2690" in collusion with the name-oriented persons (one name-based I, J.).