대여금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to Defendant C and E’s joint and several KRW 150,000 and KRW 30,000,000 among them, Defendant C and E shall begin on June 10, 2011;
1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant Company C, and E
A. On May 23, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company concluded a loan agreement with the Defendant Company to lend KRW 150,000,000 to the Defendant Company as of November 30, 201. (2) The Plaintiff transferred money under the name of the loan to the Defendant Company as follows:
① On June 10, 201, KRW 30,000 (2) (30,000,000 on July 12, 2011) < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 230, Oct. 30, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 2327, Dec. 20, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 23268, Dec. 21, 201; Presidential Decree No. 23270, Dec. 20, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 23578, Nov. 30, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 23578, Dec. 21, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 23580, Dec. 30, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 23280, Nov. 30, 2011>
(4) On December 26, 201, 201, after receipt of an amount of money transfer, Defendant C prepared and delivered a loan certificate (hereinafter “the second loan certificate”) with the following contents as joint and several sureties, and Defendant C affixed a seal on the second loan certificate as joint and several sureties.
F5) On January 30, 2012, the Defendant Company received the remittance of the said gold sources (hereinafter “third-party loan”).
(1) On August 6, 2014, Defendant C prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff, and Defendant C affixed the third certificate as a joint and several surety. F) Defendant E prepared and issued a letter of performance stating that the Plaintiff will repay KRW 150,000,000 to the Plaintiff by August 31, 2014 on behalf of the Defendant Company.
7) On November 4, 2014, Defendant C prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff a letter of payment with the following content, and Defendant E signed the letter of payment as a joint and several surety (hereinafter “instant letter of payment”).
(B) According to the above-mentioned facts, the Defendant Company’s 150,00,00 won and the Plaintiff’s 150,000 won, according to the following facts: (a) there is no dispute; (b) Gap’s 2, 4, and 8; and (c) Gap’s 3-1 through 6; and (b) the purport of the entire pleadings.