except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:00 on May 8, 2014, the Defendant purchased two balls from the “Emart” in the place where the Defendant was in a marital relationship with the Defendant at his residence, namely, the victim D (the age of 55) who was in a marital relationship with the Defendant, 103 1307 dong 1307, and money and female issues.

The defendant and the victim, together with the owner of the lawsuit, recovered a large quantity of the exemption from the water in his residence, enter the room from the room to the razine with a fire attached to the raz, and the defendant attached the gap in the door to the tape to prevent the smoke from spreading to the tape and caused the victim's death by the addiction of the rabane.

Accordingly, the defendant assisted the victim to commit suicide.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A written autopsy report and a written autopsy and appraisal report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a bank receipt, a copy of a receipt, a copy of a loan certificate, a loan certificate, a receipt, and a collateral security contract;

1. Article 252 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances for sentencing following the suspended sentence) is committed by committing the crime of this case, which led to the death of the victim, even though the Defendant attempted to commit suicide with the victim in an internal relationship. Such act of aiding and abetting suicide is a crime that infringes on the human life with absolute nature and dignity that no one can dispose of without permission.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is against the victim, and the defendant and the victim have resolved to live together in the state of mental aggravation due to the aggravation of monetary issues, female relations, etc. among them, and the defendant is against the law of this court.