특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(횡령)등
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment for three years and six months, and Defendant B’s imprisonment for one year and six months, Defendant C and D shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) is a company operating buses in Q to run in and outside the city in and outside the city in and outside the city. Defendant A, from around 2003 to February 26, 2010, has overall control over the management of company funds and personnel management, such as bus transportation revenues, subsidies received from R and Gyeong-do, etc. while holding office as the representative director from February 27, 2010 to February 27, 2010.
Defendant
B From November 2004 to October 2010, B had been in charge of the duties of settling cash and bus tickets in exchange for the fee of the bus operated by the victim company as a business clerk from November 2004 to October 201. Defendant C had been in charge of the duties of settling cash and bus tickets from August 1998 to May 201, 201. Defendant D entered the victim company as the vice head of the business division from March 2009 to March 201, and had been in charge of the business division division division division division division division division division division division division division division division and the business division division division division division division division division division division division division division division division division division division division division from March 2009 to March 201, 201, when necessary, Defendant E had been in charge of the victim company’s representative director’s duty as a driver from around 1980 to March.
Defendant
Since 1998, F has been operating a ticket office in the RP bus stops in S.
1. Defendant A’s victim of occupational breach of trust has received a large amount of subsidies from local governments in consideration of the fact that when bus operation is discontinued due to its chronic deficit operation status or public transportation transport company, it would lose means of movement for ordinary people. Defendant A received a large amount of subsidies from RP in 2013, including approximately KRW 4.1 billion from RP in 2013, approximately KRW 2 billion from Gyeongbuk-do, and KRW 6.1 billion from Gyeongbuk-do in total ( KRW 275 million in capital).
On the other hand, executives and employees are directly on the vehicle to monitor the non-compliance of bus articles, bus management status, etc. at the temporary general meeting of the victim company held on June 15, 2007.