If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The victim B is the president of the clan C, the victim D is the secretary of the clan C, and the defendant is the director of the clan C, who is the victim and the defendant are in dispute over the family property issue.

Although the victims did not have a school system or a sexual intercourse with others, they do not have any such a relationship;

1. On July 201, 201, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts by posting a phone call to E, who is a director of the family council at the end of the end of the end of the year, and stating that “B and D are not contacted, and the two travel are not intercombed.”

2. The Defendant, at around 12:00 on August 21, 201, damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts by openly stating, “B and D are likely to open to the public and have about 10 family members who are in dispute about the above issues related to B and clans.”

3. At around 11:50 on November 20, 201, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts, following the sound that “B and D have a little of 10 family members who are dissatisfied with the foregoing issues relating to the foregoing B and the clans.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol protocol of statement to B, D, H, I, and E

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (excluding an error in such sentence);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.