소유권말소등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited or added as follows. Thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
- Part written or added by the court of first instance shall be deemed to read “ February 23, 2001.” No. 14 of the court of second instance as “ February 23, 201.”
- Forms 5 and 3 of the fifth decision of the first instance are as follows.
【The grounds for the recognition of the head of the Gu, the facts that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 11, 26 through 29, Eul evidence 1 through 3, 5, 7, 10 through 13 (including each branch number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply).
(A) Each entry, witness H’s testimony, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the court of first instance 2.0
4) Paragraph 4 of the same Article is as follows. Accordingly, the sales contract of this case as of September 30, 201 and December 1, 2011, as of December 1, 201, cannot be deemed to have been concluded since there is no agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant on the sales price. It is null and void because it was formally prepared to enable the defendant to obtain a bank loan without any payment of a purchase-price between the plaintiff and the defendant without any payment of a purchase-price, and thus, it constitutes a false marking
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for registration cancellation of ownership transfer registration of this case to the Plaintiff.
- The “T land” of the 7th sentence of the first instance court is raised to “I land”. - The third sentence of the 8th sentence of the first instance court is added to “the sales contract was concluded,” and then “the sales contract was not reached due to no agreement on the purchase price.” - Paragraph 2 of the 3.b. of the 1st sentence is as follows.
“A) Next, on September 30, 201, the Plaintiff asserts that the sales contract was concluded on September 30, 201, and first, the Plaintiff did not reach an agreement on the sales contract.
However, in the contract of sale, the object and the price are always at the time of conclusion.