If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On March 18, 2015, at around 02:20, the Defendant found the victim C (the age of 56) in Daegu Suwon-gu B within the D convenience point where he works as an employee, and purchased tobacco from the victim, and the Defendant 50,000 won labs.

Accordingly, in order to confirm whether the victim is forged or scrapped, the Defendant saw the victim as “drawed, fluored, fluored, fluor,” and expressed the disturbance as “h, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor,” and obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force by neglecting customers from entering the wall, and preventing them from entering the wall.

2. At around 03:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) discovered complaints at the instant location at the same time; and (b) expressed the victim’s desire to be subject to apology with the larger interest, such as “this chexe, no circumstances exist;” and subsequently interfered with the victim’s convenience store business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;