When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. 업무방해 피고인은 2014. 4. 10. 00:50경부터 같은 날 01:10경까지 20여분 동안 남양주시 B에 있는 피해자 C 운영의 D술집에서 술에 취한 상태로 아무런 이유 없이 피해자의 아내에게 "나를 무시하지 마라. 내간 준 치킨을 먹어라."라는 등 횡설수설하고, 그곳에 있던 손님들에게 다가가 "너네 뭘

I see. G. H. H. H. H. H., Earma, Chewing f.h.

2. The Defendant, on the one hand and at the same time and at the same place, committed so as to pay the alcohol value to the victim, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as taking a bath in a large and large manner.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the above drinking value.

The defendant was obtained from the victim that is, the sum of the market value of 19,000 won in the face of the victim, and the roasting, roasting, roasting, and roasting.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business, the selection of fines) and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud and the selection of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;