However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:15, at a restaurant operated by the victim C in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and (b) at around 25 minutes, the Defendant took a bath to the employee D, who was requested to pay the food value from the employee D, and (c) took a bath to the customers who want to enter the restaurant, and (d) took a bath to the customers who want to enter the restaurant, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business for about 25 minutes by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing (the scope of recommendation) under Article 62(1) (Article 62(1)) (Article 62 of the Criminal Act (Article 62) of the Suspension of Execution Act (Article 62(1) (Article 62(1)) (Article 62 of the same Act) (Article 62 of the same Act (Article 62 of the same Act) (Article 62 of the same Act (Article 62