2. However, direct evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in this case has been stated in D and E police and in this court.

However, the victim made a statement that the defendant committed an indecent act in the state of his seat, but the victim reversed it and stated that he committed an indecent act in the state that the defendant was seated with the victim.

Although the victim asserts that the defendant's self-satisfy was the first wrong statement because he was not memory, it is difficult to understand that the defendant was unable to memory as to whether he was in a state where the defendant was seated because he committed an indecent act on several occasions in the narrow bus at the time.

(The same is more so in that the reversal of the victim's statement was made after the defendant's execution and on-site verification). E states that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in the state of his/her custody, but it seems impossible for the defendant to commit an indecent act against the victim by his/her hand under the structural condition of the bus.

Among persons who have boarded the bus at the time, there is no person who commits an indecent act against the victim except for E.

The victim and E stated to the effect that the defendant, unlike the defendant, had been on several occasions in the bus and committed an indecent act against the victim. However, witness F, G, H et al. have been continued in the bus just because the defendant was ging forward in the first place in order to see the vehicle's body in this court, and the defendant was in conversationd with the driver.

statement that it was not made.

(b) other.