To the extent that the prosecutor does not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense, the prosecutor corrected or corrected part of the facts charged (including the attached list of crimes) according to the facts obtained through the examination of evidence.

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. On April 2015, the Defendant calls the victim D to purchase the her husband’s her husband, who is a part-time executive officer, at a price lower than KRW 400-5 million than the market price.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the husband of the above E was a person who has no relation with the Mar Company, and the Defendant did not have any fact that he purchased the Marmeras bank at a low price, and there was no ability to purchase it at a low price. At the time, the Defendant was not only paid a debt amounting to approximately KRW 200 million with no special property or fixed income, but also was difficult to raise the cost of living.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) received 23,080,000 won from the victim by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim on April 7, 2015 from the victim to the new bank account of the Defendant on April 7, 2015; (b) and (c) received transfer or delivery of KRW 53,910,000 in total over 23 times from around that time to January 13, 2016, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

B. On August 2015, 2015, the Defendant, while making a call with the victim, may force the victim to return back to Korea by importing Memers from the Defendant at low time.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to purchase the Memers bank at a low price.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is subject to it from the victim.