beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고단542

특수절도등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 542"

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. From the beginning of February 2017, the Defendants: (a) committed theft of money and valuables, such as the mobile phone, etc. of the deceased and the customers; and (b) committed a theft of money and valuables from E in Jeju Island from February 2, 2017; and (c) committed such act to raise a living cost by disposing of it.

At around 02:30 on February 12, 2017, the Defendants: (a) reported the gap in the victim Faila, and (b) Defendant A stolen the victims’ property in the same way as written in the list of annexed crimes, from that time until February 22, 2017, with a cell phone owned by the victim, in the case of gallon, the victim’s market value located adjacent to the victim, and (c) Defendant A stolen the victims’ property in the same way as written in the list of annexed crimes.

B. The Defendants engaged in unlawful uttering of official documents conspired to siren vehicles in G’s name using the G driving license obtained by Defendant A from the above E Cowna.

On February 18, 2017, the Defendants entered into a vehicle siren contract at the Jeju rentalcar (State) office located in the Jeju Island on Jeju Island on February 18, 2017, and presented the said G driver's license under the name of the head of Seoul Regional Police Agency, which is an official document requested by Jeju rentalcar staff H to present an identification card to verify identity.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use official document in a fraudulent manner.

(c)

The Defendants entered into an electronic records, such as electronic records, and electronic records, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (c), and entered into a vehicle siren contract as if Defendant B was G, and caused the said H to enter “G” into the leased and driver name column of the electronic contract by accessing Defendant B to the electronic computer network inside the Jeju rental car, and then sent the said electronic contract to the said H as if it was duly formed.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with each other.